I'm generally an impressively apolitical creature--it may be more accurate to say apathopolitical--but, from time to time, I ponder what, exactly, my political views are. (These bouts are often set off by a "fill in your profile" form somewhere.)
I was never in danger of becoming right-wing in any flavor; I value social diversity too highly. So I figured I was left-wing. A Democrat. But it never fully resonated. In fact, it started to
chafe when my father, a lifelong registered Republican, answered my question why he wasn't a Democrat. (He occasionally voted for Democrats; I was confused.)
He said helping the poor and needy is a good thing, but it shouldn't be a government task. It should be left to private individuals with the means and the drive to help. Why? Because if you give the government a hundred dollars to feed the poor, ninety-nine of them will be wasted on filing forms and stamping releases and paying staff members, and only one will make it to the food banks. So give your hundred dollars, one at a time, to homeless people, and you accomplish a hundredfold more.
This resonated. Capital
R resonated. And so I found myself neither Democrat nor Republican. I guessed I was an Independent. But that's not a principle; it's a catch-all category.
Years later, I was introduced to the term
Libertarian. In it, I recognized my father's explanation. I understood why he sometimes voted within his party, sometimes against. And if you ask me today, that's what I'll tell you I am.
Of course, Libertarians argue amongst themselves about what it really means to be one, and there are streams and schools of thought and genres, just as in any complex ideology. I don't claim to be an expert; I don't pretend to have considered every aspect of life to see how Libertarianism fits in. I'm expressing what it means to me, today.
"Libertarians are committed to the belief ... that individuals have rights against certain kinds of forcible interference on the part of others ..."We are all entitled, as human beings, to live the lives that fulfill us, as long as our actions don't rob others of the same right. Gay marriage is not "forcible interference"; gay bashing is. Believing in God is not "forcible interference"; waging an Inquisition is. Marching in a Ku Klux Klan parade is not; burning crosses on a black man's lawn is. Demonstrating against an abortion clinic is not; bombing one is.
"... that liberty, understood as non-interference, is the only thing that can be legitimately demanded of others as a matter of legal or political right ..."The only laws a government should make are those preserving the right to individual liberty. Morality laws are the antithesis of liberty.
This means that not only are marrying your gay partner, being a devout Christian, and peacably expressing your personal dislike of blacks or abortion not "forcible interference"; laws that prohibit, curtail, or pigeonhole them in any way
are. (For the record, I share none of these four qualities.)
"... that the only proper use of coercion is defensive"Unfortunately, some people do great violence to liberty, and fighting back is sometimes the only way to protect others' right to live freely, without interference. There are circumstances that justify killing; incarceration; even war. Adolf Hitler and Jeffrey Dahmer embody two such situations.
Communities work best when smallI don't know if this is considered a Libertarian tenet, but I believe that small communities are the only kind that can embody the values above. Over a certain threshhold, you lose the intimacy of knowing your peers; of caring about those around you; of knowing who's a rotten apple and who's a good egg--which I think is far more useful in deciding whether Johnny raped Sally or Sally is telling tall tales than is a parade of evidence and persuasive talk from lawyers.
When communities grow too large, even the minimal government espoused by Libertarian views grows unwieldy, needing paperwork and rules about paperwork, drowning in inefficiency.
Diversity is a source of beauty and meaningThis has been a core belief of mine since I was too little to speak, and it's a large part of why I embrace Libertarian values. It underlies my choice of post title. And it makes this a good place to say, I welcome your thoughts. (Be warned: nastiness and name-calling won't make it past comment moderation. That's not authoritarianism; that's because people who can't make their point without it bore me.)
All quotes are from the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.